Surface versus bulk
XRF reads the first few microns. A thick plating can read as solid: a thickness measurement settles the doubt.
Precious metals and watchmaking
On a piece of jewellery, an ingot or a watch component, destructive analysis is not an option. X-ray fluorescence reads the surface composition and the thickness of coatings without taking anything away — and serves gold buy-back as readily as the control of a coating a few microns thick.
Determining the fineness of gold, spotting a thin plating passed off as solid, checking the consistency of a supply: the measurement takes seconds and leaves the piece untouched.
It serves the buy-back counter as much as the workshop.
Watchmaking stacks layers: gildings, successive deposits, surface treatments. XRF measures those thicknesses from aluminium to tin, layer by layer, without a metallographic section.
It also serves downstream of the process: assessing the precious metals carried off in cutting and polishing oils means putting a figure on what leaves with the effluent.
Titanium nitride, decorative gold, DLC: the vacuum coatings on cases and bracelets are counted in tenths of a micron. Too much gold is costly, too little wears through — and the tolerance is held by measurement, not by eye.
X-ray fluorescence reads the thickness of titanium and gold layers on the finished part, without a cross-section. DLC, being carbon, is characterised by Raman.
Fire assay remains the reference: it melts a test portion and measures its whole mass. It also consumes it, calls for a laboratory, and is paid for on every piece.
X-ray fluorescence reads the composition in seconds, on the finished piece, without breaking into anything — but it reads only a surface. On a homogeneous alloy, the two agree — which is what the SN EN ISO 23345 standard governs. On a plated piece, fire assay settles it.
We measure your pieces and show you the right instrument: alloy fineness, coating thickness, on the finished piece.